Master Ethics & Law (GMC Guidelines)
for PLAB 1
Access 50+ high-yield questions tailored for the 2026 syllabus. Includes AI-powered explanations and performance tracking.
Core Concepts
- Four Pillars of Medical Ethics (Beauchamp and Childress):
- Autonomy: Patient's right to make their own informed decisions. Requires capacity.
- Beneficence: Acting in the patient's best interest.
- Non-maleficence: Do no harm.
- Justice: Fair and equitable distribution of healthcare resources.
- Confidentiality: Duty to protect patient information.
- Exceptions: Patient consent, public interest (e.g., unfit driver, serious crime), court order, statutory requirement.
- Consent (VIC): Must be Voluntary, Informed, and given by a person with Capacity.
- Types: Implied (e.g., offering arm for BP), Expressed (verbal), Written (surgery).
- Children:
- Gillick Competence (Under 16): Can consent if they understand the proposed treatment/implications, even without parental consent. Doctors must assess.
- Fraser Guidelines (Contraception for Under 16): Specific guidance for contraception without parental knowledge if Gillick competent and certain criteria met.
- Advance Decisions to Refuse Treatment (ADRTs): Legally binding if valid (written, signed, witnessed, applies to situation, patient had capacity when made).
- Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) for Health & Welfare: Appointed by patient to make decisions if they lose capacity.
- Capacity (Mental Capacity Act 2005):
- Two-Stage Test:
- Diagnostic: Does the person have an impairment of the mind or brain?
- Functional: Does this impairment mean they are unable to make a specific decision when needed? (Unable to understand information, retain information, weigh information, communicate decision).
- Presumption of capacity. Decisions must be in patient's best interests if they lack capacity.
- Two-Stage Test:
- Duty of Candour (GMC): Openness and honesty when something goes wrong with patient care, including explaining what happened, potential effects, and offering an apology.
- Raising Concerns (Whistleblowing): Professional duty to raise concerns about patient safety, colleague's conduct/performance (Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 protects whistleblowers).
- Professionalism: Maintain boundaries, manage personal beliefs (cannot refuse treatment based on personal beliefs if it affects patient care), declare conflicts of interest.
- Record Keeping: Clear, accurate, contemporaneous, legible, attributable.
Clinical Presentation
- Patient refusing life-saving treatment (Autonomy, Capacity).
- Family requesting patient's medical information (Confidentiality).
- Concern about a colleague's substance misuse or poor practice (Raising Concerns).
- Adolescent requesting contraception without parental knowledge (Gillick/Fraser).
- Patient with fluctuating mental state requiring urgent decision (Capacity, Best Interests).
- Patient making a complaint about care received (Duty of Candour, Professionalism).
- Doctor asked to provide a report for court (Confidentiality, Record Keeping).
- Dilemma over allocating scarce resources (Justice).
- Managing an adverse event or medical error (Duty of Candour).
Diagnosis (Gold Standard)
Applying the ethical framework (Four Pillars) to the specific scenario. Performing a formal capacity assessment if doubt exists (MCA 2005). Identifying and referencing relevant GMC guidelines. Seeking advice from senior colleagues, ethics committees, or legal teams for complex cases. Documenting the entire decision-making process thoroughly.
Management (First Line)
- Patient-centred Approach: Prioritise the patient's best interests and autonomy.
- Communication: Engage in open, honest, and clear communication with the patient (or their LPA/next of kin if lacking capacity).
- Documentation: Maintain meticulous, contemporaneous records of all discussions, decisions, assessments (especially capacity), and rationale.
- GMC Guidelines: Always adhere to "Good Medical Practice" and specific GMC guidance relevant to the situation.
- Escalation & Discussion: Discuss complex ethical dilemmas with senior colleagues, the multidisciplinary team, ethics committees, or legal services.
- Reflection & Learning: Reflect on the situation and learn from outcomes, especially adverse events, in line with Duty of Candour.
Exam Red Flags
- Sharing patient information without valid consent or justifiable public interest.
- Overriding a capacitous patient's refusal of treatment.
- Failing to adequately assess capacity when there is doubt, or assuming lack of capacity.
- Prioritising personal beliefs (e.g., religious) over a patient's best interests or evidence-based care.
- Failing to raise concerns about a colleague's fitness to practice or patient safety issues.
- Not documenting important discussions, decisions, or rationales, especially regarding consent or capacity.
- Failing to be open and honest after an adverse event (breaching Duty of Candour).
- Breaching professional boundaries with a patient.
Sample Practice Questions
A GP is asked by her healthy adult daughter, who lives in another town, for a prescription for a common over-the-counter allergy medication that is available on prescription at a lower cost. The daughter claims she is too busy to see her own GP. What is the most appropriate response for the GP according to GMC guidance?
Dr. Patel, a Foundation Year 1 doctor, observes a consistent pattern of poor hand hygiene amongst some senior nursing staff on her ward, despite repeated reminders during ward rounds and mandatory training sessions. She is concerned this poses a significant infection risk to vulnerable patients. She has informally raised the issue with the ward manager, but no visible changes have occurred. What is Dr. Patel's MOST appropriate next step, according to GMC guidance on raising concerns?
An 82-year-old woman with a history of vascular dementia is admitted to hospital after a fall. She requires a hip replacement. Her capacity to make decisions fluctuates; some days she seems lucid and agrees to the surgery, on others she is confused and refuses, stating she doesn't want "them cutting me open." Her daughter, who holds a Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) for health and welfare, is present and insists the surgery proceeds, stating it's what her mother would have wanted when she was well. What is the MOST appropriate approach to obtaining consent for the surgery?
Ready to see the answers?
Unlock All AnswersPLAB 1
- ✓ 50+ Ethics & Law (GMC Guidelines) Questions
- ✓ AI Tutor Assistance
- ✓ Detailed Explanations
- ✓ Performance Analytics