HomeMSRAProfessional Dilemmas (SJT)

Master Professional Dilemmas (SJT)
for MSRA

Access 50+ high-yield questions tailored for the 2026 syllabus. Includes AI-powered explanations and performance tracking.

Start Free Practice View Full Syllabus
HIGH YIELD NOTES ~5 min read

Core Concepts

The Situational Judgement Test (SJT) section of the MSRA assesses your understanding of appropriate behaviour for a doctor, focusing on professional attributes, values, and behaviours, rather than medical knowledge. It evaluates your ability to make sound judgements in challenging professional scenarios. Core principles are primarily derived from the GMC's Good Medical Practice (2024), which serves as the fundamental ethical framework for doctors in the UK. Key concepts include:

  • Patient Safety First: The paramount consideration in all decisions.
  • Ethical Pillars: Autonomy (patient's right to make decisions), Beneficence (acting in the patient's best interest), Non-maleficence (doing no harm), Justice (fairness).
  • Confidentiality: Maintaining patient information as private, with strict exceptions (e.g., patient or public safety at serious risk, legal requirement).
  • Consent: Valid, voluntary, and informed consent is essential for all investigations and treatments. Assess capacity first.
  • Capacity: Ability to make a specific decision at a specific time (Mental Capacity Act 2005). Assume capacity unless proven otherwise.
  • Duty of Candour: Being open and honest with patients when something goes wrong.
  • Professionalism & Integrity: Maintaining high standards of conduct, honesty, and accountability.
  • Teamwork & Communication: Effective collaboration and clear, respectful communication with patients, colleagues, and other healthcare professionals.
  • Raising Concerns: A professional duty to speak up when patient safety or care is compromised by colleagues or systems.
  • Maintaining Boundaries: Professional separation from patients and their families.

Clinical Presentation

  • Ethical Dilemmas: End-of-life care, refusal of treatment, capacity assessment, allocation of scarce resources.
  • Colleague Conflict: Disagreements with senior or junior staff, concerns about a colleague's competence or conduct (e.g., substance abuse, poor performance).
  • Patient Complaints: Handling dissatisfaction, challenging communication, managing difficult family members.
  • Errors & Adverse Events: Medication errors, procedural complications, near misses – requiring duty of candour and reporting.
  • Breaches of Confidentiality: Accidental disclosure, inappropriate sharing of patient information (including social media).
  • Professional Misconduct: Dishonesty, inappropriate relationships, misuse of social media.
  • Resource Management: Time pressures, staff shortages, equipment malfunction.
  • Consent Issues: Lack of valid consent, patient changing mind, difficulties with communicating information.

Diagnosis (Gold Standard)

The "gold standard" for determining the correct action in a professional dilemma is to **consult the GMC's Good Medical Practice guidance**. This document outlines the standards expected of doctors. Beyond this, a structured approach involves:

  • Gathering Information: Ascertaining all relevant facts, perspectives, and potential implications.
  • Identifying Stakeholders: Recognising who is affected by the decision (patient, family, colleagues, hospital).
  • Applying Ethical Principles: Considering which GMC principles and ethical pillars are most relevant to the situation.
  • Reflecting: Considering how your actions align with professional values and potential consequences.
  • Seeking Advice: Consulting senior colleagues, your clinical supervisor, MDO (Medical Defence Organisation), ethics committee, or the GMC directly for complex issues.
  • Documenting: Recording the dilemma, discussions held, advice sought, and rationale for decisions made.

Management (First Line)

  • Prioritise Patient Safety: Always address immediate risks to patient well-being first.
  • Communicate Clearly & Respectfully: With patients, families, and colleagues. Be empathetic and professional.
  • Escalate Appropriately: Do not try to manage complex or high-risk issues alone. Inform and involve senior colleagues (registrar, consultant, clinical supervisor, nurse in charge).
  • Seek Expert Advice: For legal, ethical, or highly sensitive matters, contact your Medical Defence Organisation (MDO) early.
  • Document Thoroughly: Record the situation, your actions, discussions with others, advice received, and the rationale for your decisions. This protects you and aids continuity of care.
  • Duty of Candour: If an error has occurred, explain it openly and honestly to the patient (or their family, if appropriate), apologise, and outline steps being taken to mitigate harm and prevent recurrence.
  • Maintain Confidentiality: Only disclose patient information when legally or ethically justified.
  • Challenge Appropriately: If you have concerns about a colleague's conduct or competence, approach them professionally in the first instance. If the concern persists or is serious, follow local policies for raising concerns/whistleblowing, escalating to your clinical supervisor or senior management.
  • Reflect & Learn: Use dilemmas as opportunities for personal and professional growth.

Exam Red Flags

  • Acting Alone: Never the best option for complex or high-stakes dilemmas. Always involve seniors.
  • Ignoring a Concern: Especially those related to patient safety or colleague fitness to practice.
  • Confrontational/Aggressive Approach: Immediately accusing or blaming without gathering facts.
  • Breaking Confidentiality Without Justification: Doing so without a clear risk to patient/public or legal mandate.
  • Prioritising Personal Interest/Reputation: Over patient safety or professional duties.
  • Lying or Giving False Reassurance: Breaches duty of candour and trust.
  • Assuming Capacity: Always assess capacity for specific decisions.
  • Jumping to Conclusions: Without gathering all relevant information or perspectives.
  • Misusing Social Media: Discussing patients, colleagues, or inappropriate content.
  • Performing Actions Beyond Competence: Or without adequate supervision.

Sample Practice Questions

Question 1

Dr. Liam, an F1, accidentally administers a standard dose of a routine medication to a patient, but it was due to be omitted for that specific dose due to a recent change in the drug chart he overlooked. The patient experiences no adverse effects and is clinically stable. What is the MOST appropriate immediate action for Dr. Liam to take?

A) Immediately inform his Clinical Supervisor or a senior colleague and document the error in the patient's notes.
B) Update the drug chart to reflect that the medication was given, and then continue with routine duties.
C) Monitor the patient closely for any potential side effects, and if none occur, omit reporting to avoid unnecessary paperwork.
D) Inform the patient about the error, even though there were no adverse effects, and apologise.
Explanation: This area is hidden for preview users.
Question 2

Dr. Chloe Lim, an F2 doctor, is covering the cardiology ward. She receives a call from Mrs. Khan, the daughter of an 82-year-old patient, Mr. Tariq Khan, who was admitted with heart failure. Mrs. Khan is very worried and asks for an update on her father's condition, including his prognosis. Dr. Lim checks Mr. Khan's notes and sees that he has explicitly stated in his admission paperwork that he does NOT want his family to be given any information about his condition, as he prefers to manage the communication himself. However, Mrs. Khan sounds genuinely distressed and says, 'My father always tells me everything. He must just be too unwell to call me himself. Please, just tell me if he's getting better.' What is the MOST appropriate action for Dr. Lim to take?

A) Tell Mrs. Khan that she needs to speak directly with her father or wait for him to contact her, without explaining the reason related to confidentiality.
B) Provide Mrs. Khan with a brief, general update on her father's stable condition to alleviate her distress, without disclosing specific medical details.
C) Politely inform Mrs. Khan that due to patient confidentiality, she cannot share any information about her father's condition without his explicit consent, which he has not given for this situation.
D) Consult with her consultant to see if an exception can be made given the daughter's distress and the father's potential inability to communicate.
Explanation: This area is hidden for preview users.
Question 3

Dr. Chloe Davies is an FY2 doctor on a surgical ward. She is struggling with the workload and has fallen behind on her discharge summaries. A senior nurse, noticing her stress, offers to 'help out' by signing off some of the summaries that Dr. Davies has drafted but not yet thoroughly reviewed or checked against patient notes. The nurse assures Dr. Davies that she often helps other junior doctors this way to prevent delays. What is the most appropriate action for Dr. Davies to take?

A) Politely decline the nurse's offer, explaining that signing discharge summaries is a medical responsibility that she must personally complete.
B) Allow the nurse to sign off the summaries, as it will help clear her backlog and the nurse seems experienced.
C) Report the nurse's offer to the ward manager, as it constitutes a serious breach of professional boundaries.
D) Thank the nurse for the offer but suggest she helps with other administrative tasks instead, like chasing scans.
Explanation: This area is hidden for preview users.

Ready to see the answers?

Unlock All Answers

MSRA

  • ✓ 50+ Professional Dilemmas (SJT) Questions
  • ✓ AI Tutor Assistance
  • ✓ Detailed Explanations
  • ✓ Performance Analytics
Get Full Access