HomeMSRAProfessional Dilemmas (SJT)

Master Professional Dilemmas (SJT)
for MSRA

Access 50+ high-yield questions tailored for the 2026 syllabus. Includes AI-powered explanations and performance tracking.

Start Free Practice View Full Syllabus
HIGH YIELD NOTES ~5 min read

Core Concepts

The Situational Judgement Test (SJT) section of the MSRA assesses your understanding of appropriate behaviour for a doctor, focusing on professional attributes, values, and behaviours, rather than medical knowledge. It evaluates your ability to make sound judgements in challenging professional scenarios. Core principles are primarily derived from the GMC's Good Medical Practice (2024), which serves as the fundamental ethical framework for doctors in the UK. Key concepts include:

  • Patient Safety First: The paramount consideration in all decisions.
  • Ethical Pillars: Autonomy (patient's right to make decisions), Beneficence (acting in the patient's best interest), Non-maleficence (doing no harm), Justice (fairness).
  • Confidentiality: Maintaining patient information as private, with strict exceptions (e.g., patient or public safety at serious risk, legal requirement).
  • Consent: Valid, voluntary, and informed consent is essential for all investigations and treatments. Assess capacity first.
  • Capacity: Ability to make a specific decision at a specific time (Mental Capacity Act 2005). Assume capacity unless proven otherwise.
  • Duty of Candour: Being open and honest with patients when something goes wrong.
  • Professionalism & Integrity: Maintaining high standards of conduct, honesty, and accountability.
  • Teamwork & Communication: Effective collaboration and clear, respectful communication with patients, colleagues, and other healthcare professionals.
  • Raising Concerns: A professional duty to speak up when patient safety or care is compromised by colleagues or systems.
  • Maintaining Boundaries: Professional separation from patients and their families.

Clinical Presentation

  • Ethical Dilemmas: End-of-life care, refusal of treatment, capacity assessment, allocation of scarce resources.
  • Colleague Conflict: Disagreements with senior or junior staff, concerns about a colleague's competence or conduct (e.g., substance abuse, poor performance).
  • Patient Complaints: Handling dissatisfaction, challenging communication, managing difficult family members.
  • Errors & Adverse Events: Medication errors, procedural complications, near misses – requiring duty of candour and reporting.
  • Breaches of Confidentiality: Accidental disclosure, inappropriate sharing of patient information (including social media).
  • Professional Misconduct: Dishonesty, inappropriate relationships, misuse of social media.
  • Resource Management: Time pressures, staff shortages, equipment malfunction.
  • Consent Issues: Lack of valid consent, patient changing mind, difficulties with communicating information.

Diagnosis (Gold Standard)

The "gold standard" for determining the correct action in a professional dilemma is to **consult the GMC's Good Medical Practice guidance**. This document outlines the standards expected of doctors. Beyond this, a structured approach involves:

  • Gathering Information: Ascertaining all relevant facts, perspectives, and potential implications.
  • Identifying Stakeholders: Recognising who is affected by the decision (patient, family, colleagues, hospital).
  • Applying Ethical Principles: Considering which GMC principles and ethical pillars are most relevant to the situation.
  • Reflecting: Considering how your actions align with professional values and potential consequences.
  • Seeking Advice: Consulting senior colleagues, your clinical supervisor, MDO (Medical Defence Organisation), ethics committee, or the GMC directly for complex issues.
  • Documenting: Recording the dilemma, discussions held, advice sought, and rationale for decisions made.

Management (First Line)

  • Prioritise Patient Safety: Always address immediate risks to patient well-being first.
  • Communicate Clearly & Respectfully: With patients, families, and colleagues. Be empathetic and professional.
  • Escalate Appropriately: Do not try to manage complex or high-risk issues alone. Inform and involve senior colleagues (registrar, consultant, clinical supervisor, nurse in charge).
  • Seek Expert Advice: For legal, ethical, or highly sensitive matters, contact your Medical Defence Organisation (MDO) early.
  • Document Thoroughly: Record the situation, your actions, discussions with others, advice received, and the rationale for your decisions. This protects you and aids continuity of care.
  • Duty of Candour: If an error has occurred, explain it openly and honestly to the patient (or their family, if appropriate), apologise, and outline steps being taken to mitigate harm and prevent recurrence.
  • Maintain Confidentiality: Only disclose patient information when legally or ethically justified.
  • Challenge Appropriately: If you have concerns about a colleague's conduct or competence, approach them professionally in the first instance. If the concern persists or is serious, follow local policies for raising concerns/whistleblowing, escalating to your clinical supervisor or senior management.
  • Reflect & Learn: Use dilemmas as opportunities for personal and professional growth.

Exam Red Flags

  • Acting Alone: Never the best option for complex or high-stakes dilemmas. Always involve seniors.
  • Ignoring a Concern: Especially those related to patient safety or colleague fitness to practice.
  • Confrontational/Aggressive Approach: Immediately accusing or blaming without gathering facts.
  • Breaking Confidentiality Without Justification: Doing so without a clear risk to patient/public or legal mandate.
  • Prioritising Personal Interest/Reputation: Over patient safety or professional duties.
  • Lying or Giving False Reassurance: Breaches duty of candour and trust.
  • Assuming Capacity: Always assess capacity for specific decisions.
  • Jumping to Conclusions: Without gathering all relevant information or perspectives.
  • Misusing Social Media: Discussing patients, colleagues, or inappropriate content.
  • Performing Actions Beyond Competence: Or without adequate supervision.

Sample Practice Questions

Question 1

Dr. Fiona Green is working in a busy emergency department. A patient presents with symptoms that strongly suggest a rare, highly contagious infectious disease. The patient is refusing to be isolated or to cooperate with public health measures, citing personal freedom. The patient is lucid and has full capacity. What is Dr. Green's MOST appropriate initial response?

A) Explain the public health risks and the legal implications of non-compliance, emphasizing the duty to protect others.
B) Respect the patient's autonomy and allow them to leave, noting their refusal in the medical records.
C) Immediately contact security and public health authorities to enforce isolation.
D) Attempt to persuade the patient by downplaying the severity of the disease to reduce their anxiety.
Explanation: This area is hidden for preview users.
Question 2

Mrs. Chen, an 88-year-old patient admitted with pneumonia, has fluctuating capacity due to delirium. When lucid, she clearly expresses a wish to go home as soon as possible and refuses a specific non-urgent diagnostic test. Her daughter, who holds Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) for health and welfare, insists that her mother *must* have the test and remain in hospital until it's done, stating it's 'for her own good' and against Mrs. Chen's wishes when lucid. What is the MOST appropriate next step?

A) Follow the daughter's instruction, as she has LPA and is acting in what she believes is her mother's best interest.
B) Proceed with Mrs. Chen's expressed wishes when lucid, as she has fluctuating capacity rather than persistent lack of capacity.
C) Arrange for an urgent best interests meeting involving the family, senior medical staff, and potentially an independent advocate.
D) Administer a sedative to Mrs. Chen to facilitate the diagnostic test, as her daughter believes it's essential.
Explanation: This area is hidden for preview users.
Question 3

You are Dr. Liam O'Connell, a Specialty Registrar in General Practice. During a routine consultation, a patient, Mrs. Davies, confides in you that her husband, also your patient, has been expressing suicidal ideations recently. She is extremely worried but asks you not to tell her husband that she has told you, as he made her promise not to. Mrs. Davies explains her husband has been refusing to seek help and she fears telling him she broke her promise might make things worse, but she genuinely believes he is at significant risk. What is the MOST appropriate next step?

A) Reassure Mrs. Davies that you will respect her wishes and not mention her involvement, then contact her husband immediately to arrange an urgent review for his mental health.
B) Inform Mrs. Davies that you cannot keep her confidence regarding such serious concerns and that you must inform her husband you know, then proceed to contact him.
C) Thank Mrs. Davies for the information, explain that your priority is her husband's safety, and that you will act on the information, but you will not disclose the source if it would endanger her or worsen the situation, then make an urgent plan for her husband.
D) Advise Mrs. Davies that you can only act if her husband presents himself, as you must respect patient confidentiality regarding his condition.
Explanation: This area is hidden for preview users.

Ready to see the answers?

Unlock All Answers

MSRA

  • ✓ 50+ Professional Dilemmas (SJT) Questions
  • ✓ AI Tutor Assistance
  • ✓ Detailed Explanations
  • ✓ Performance Analytics
Get Full Access