HomeMSRACPS - Paediatrics

Master CPS - Paediatrics
for MSRA

Access 50+ high-yield questions tailored for the 2026 syllabus. Includes AI-powered explanations and performance tracking.

Start Free Practice View Full Syllabus
HIGH YIELD NOTES ~5 min read

Core Concepts

Child Protection & Safeguarding (CPS) in paediatrics focuses on protecting children from harm and promoting their welfare. It is a legal and ethical duty for all healthcare professionals. Child maltreatment encompasses physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect. Professionals must understand their responsibilities, recognise signs of harm, and know the referral pathways. The child's welfare is paramount. Risk factors include child vulnerability, parental mental health, substance abuse, domestic violence, and poverty. Understanding the local multi-agency safeguarding hub (MASH) process is key.

Clinical Presentation

  • Physical Abuse: Unexplained bruises, fractures (especially <1 year, spiral, metaphyseal, posterior rib), burns (glove & stocking, clear demarcation), head injuries (subdural haemorrhage, retinal haemorrhages), multiple injuries of varying ages, injuries inconsistent with history or developmental stage.
  • Sexual Abuse: Genital/anal injury, STIs, UTIs, painful urination/defecation, sudden behavioural changes (withdrawal, aggression, sexualised play), disclosure.
  • Emotional Abuse: Severe behavioural problems, anxiety, depression, low self-esteem, developmental delay, 'failure to thrive' without organic cause, psychosomatic complaints.
  • Neglect: Malnutrition, poor hygiene, poor growth, recurrent preventable illness, dental neglect, lack of supervision, inadequate clothing, missed appointments, unsafe living conditions.
  • Fabricated or Induced Illness (FII) / Münchausen by Proxy: Recurrent unexplained illness, discrepancies in history/findings, parent overly involved/knowledgeable, symptoms only present with parent, parent seeking unnecessary procedures/investigations.

Diagnosis (Gold Standard)

Diagnosis is a process involving meticulous data collection and multi-agency collaboration, rather than a single test. It typically involves a detailed history (from child if appropriate, parents/carers separately), comprehensive head-to-toe physical examination (documenting all findings, including photographs if appropriate and consent/legal basis exists), and targeted investigations (e.g., skeletal survey for <2 years with suspected physical abuse, neuroimaging for head injury, blood tests for clotting disorders). The 'gold standard' is a robust multi-agency assessment through the Local Authority Children's Services (Social Care), often involving paediatricians, police, and other specialists, leading to a conclusion of whether significant harm is occurring or is likely to occur.

Management (First Line)

The immediate priority is to ensure the child's safety. If there is immediate danger, emergency protection measures (e.g., hospital admission, police involvement) may be necessary. The first-line management for suspected child maltreatment is a mandatory referral to Local Authority Children's Services (Social Care) via the MASH, following local safeguarding policies, when there is reasonable cause to suspect a child is suffering or is likely to suffer significant harm. Healthcare professionals must maintain meticulous, objective, and factual documentation of all findings, conversations, and actions. Communication with families must be sensitive and non-accusatory, maintaining professional boundaries. Relevant information should be shared with other agencies (Social Care, Police) following safeguarding information-sharing principles.

Exam Red Flags

  • Discrepancy between stated history and injury pattern (e.g., child too young for injury mechanism).
  • Delayed presentation for a significant injury.
  • Inconsistent or changing accounts of how an injury occurred.
  • Injuries inconsistent with the child's developmental stage (e.g., fractured femur in a non-mobile infant).
  • Multiple injuries of different ages.
  • 'Sentinel injuries' such as unexplained bruises in a non-mobile infant.
  • Classic non-accidental injury patterns: posterior rib fractures, metaphyseal fractures, subdural haemorrhage, retinal haemorrhages.
  • Burns with clear demarcation or 'glove and stocking' distribution.
  • Parent/carer preventing access to child or refusing necessary investigations.
  • Child appears withdrawn, frightened, or overly compliant in the presence of a parent/carer.
  • History of previous unexplained injuries or 'near misses' in the child or siblings.
  • Unexplained 'failure to thrive' despite observed adequate caloric intake.
  • Parent/carer presenting child with recurrent, unusual, or unexplained symptoms without a clear diagnosis, and appearing overly knowledgeable or calm in serious situations (FII).

Sample Practice Questions

Question 1

During a routine well-child check, an 8-year-old boy quietly tells you, 'My uncle touches me in my private places sometimes when I stay at his house.' He appears visibly distressed after making this statement. What is your immediate priority?

A) Ask the child for more specific details about what happened, when, and where, to gather evidence.
B) Reassure the child that everything will be alright and tell him to try not to worry about it.
C) Immediately inform the child's parents about the disclosure so they can address the situation.
D) Document the child's statement verbatim, avoid asking leading questions, and immediately inform your designated safeguarding lead or a senior colleague.
Explanation: This area is hidden for preview users.
Question 2

An 18-month-old child presents to the paediatric clinic with concerns about 'failure to thrive'. Their weight is on the 0.4th centile (previously 25th centile at 6 months), and height is on the 2nd centile. The child appears quiet, withdrawn, and has evidence of poor hygiene with dirty nails and unkempt hair. The parents express frustration, stating the child is a 'fussy eater' and that they 'don't know what to do'. Previous dietary advice from the health visitor has not resulted in improvement. What is the most appropriate next step in managing this child?

A) Provide further detailed dietary advice and a high-calorie supplement prescription, with a follow-up appointment in 2 weeks.
B) Refer the child to a paediatric dietitian for comprehensive nutritional assessment and management.
C) Arrange admission to the paediatric ward for supervised feeding and observation, and make an urgent referral to social services.
D) Order comprehensive investigations including coeliac screen, thyroid function tests, and stool studies to rule out underlying organic causes.
Explanation: This area is hidden for preview users.
Question 3

A 9-month-old infant presents to the emergency department with a 6-hour history of fever (T 39.5°C), irritability, and a non-blanching purpuric rash on their trunk and limbs. They are drowsy but rousable. Heart rate is 160 bpm, respiratory rate 45 bpm, capillary refill time 4 seconds. What is the MOST appropriate immediate action?

A) Administer intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics and fluid bolus.
B) Obtain a full set of blood investigations including blood culture and CRP.
C) Perform a lumbar puncture for CSF analysis.
D) Administer oral paracetamol and observe for improvement.
Explanation: This area is hidden for preview users.

Ready to see the answers?

Unlock All Answers

MSRA

  • ✓ 50+ CPS - Paediatrics Questions
  • ✓ AI Tutor Assistance
  • ✓ Detailed Explanations
  • ✓ Performance Analytics
Get Full Access